Category / technology

by Diane Tate

Not all casting is the same

Last year I was intrigued when I read about Magic Recs, which purported to be an ‘experiment’ by Twitter. The goal was to offer intelligent suggestions on which Twitter accounts would be interesting to follow. Always keen to understand how social graphs are developed and enhanced, I was further intrigued by the fact that ‘signing up’ simply entailed that I follow the eponymous Twitter account.

I was a bit shocked when I then started seeing all kinds of notifications not of suggested accounts to follow, but of specific actions taken by my own followers. This is how it looks:

MagicRecs

This targeted, direct messaging of other users’ behavior took me aback. While technically information about who is following who is available to those who have copious amounts of spare time to hunt for such information, disclosure of these events – as they happen – is not the service people sign up for when they sign up for Twitter, which is effectively an individual broadcast service.

When I (quickly) concluded that simply learning who other people are following is not an ingenious recommendation algorithm – and surely one that breaches the assumptions I made when I signed up – I unfollowed the account.

Now the ‘experiment’ is a default. And while with some effort you can opt out of seeing others activity by deselecting the pre-checked ‘recommendations’ notification box, you can’t opt out of others seeing yours.

As a broadcast service, this narrowcasting is an entirely different, intrusive proposition. This is why people balked when location-aware services using APIs from check-in services (reference Highlight and Banjo, who since ‘pivoted’) started notifying them who was closeby without any specific intent by the user to do so. Sure this was all ‘discoverable’ – but it was far from the experience that those checking in (or simply allowing their location to be picked up by certain apps) signed up for.

Because narrow ain’t broad. It’s different.

Update 20 March 2014: despite changing my notification settings to no longer receive these messages, I continue to receive direct texts of who is following whom. So the unwilling voyeuristm continues.

by Diane Tate

Keep It Weird. For Real.

I am back from South by Southwest. Interactive, that is. Most people would say this year’s interactive festival is a relative yawner, with no real huge splashy launches so characteristic of years past. Some posit it’s a sign of the privacy-seeking times. I think it’s something else, and fixable.

I encountered a symptom of the issue upon disembarkment. As I joined a taxi line that briefly reminded me of CES in Vegas (though this was far less painful — it was Austin, after all), I encountered this fellow:

suitatAUSTBerg

Despite the absence of skinny jeans and hoodie, I suspended all disbelief and inquired whether he was attending. He confirmed my bias when he said no. As a local, he was unsurprisingly disenchanted that he chose to arrive the same day Interactive was kicking off. And while it’s not just long-time attendees who lament that the event has gotten too big, Austinites have some influence on this. Per this one, the city subsidizes the event through lowered-to-no use fees – and locals plan to fight this. We’ll see how that goes.

Until then, the machine goes on.

To clarify, I have no complaints personally. My two panels were fantastic: Saturday morning I had the privilege to wax on about cause-related tech startups with great people from the Kapor Center for Social Impact and Code for America. And later in the day I tried to fend off imposter syndrome when I was asked to be a judge for startup blog TechCocktail‘s pitch competition along with (among others) a U.S. Senator and the former CEO & Chair of AOL.

And of course, I got to go to parties and wear silly hats.

alicemedana

But many are discussing not only the unwieldy size of the event, but also the lack of ‘shizzle’ and I think I know why. It has to do with the fact that tech and launch events abound. But Austin itself is special. The core appeal of “South By” – the actual name itself being a tweak of a famous movie – is that it takes place in a town that is eccentric, arty and eclectic. It’s AUSTIN. Every single person I know who attends raves more about the City than the festival…

 

So it’s no wonder the event still manages to attract some top firepower at panels, keynotes and all kinds of breakouts. This year alone had Neil deGrasse Tyson, Edward Snowden and more….and a humble breakout hosted by EFF and Boing Boing had me conversing freely with some of the Internet’s original architects. Sure I can do this in San Francisco. But the density of people intentionally gathering for these conversations is special and reason enough to go.

But it could be so much more! Despite Interactive’s history of tapping into the musical and creative ethos of the place, it has strayed a little.

My friend Mykel – himself a cultural muse and former Angelino now happily residing in Austin – really nailed it. The music segment (happening now) really taps into the heart of Austin: the artists and the venues. Interactive, as it is currently tacked onto the front of the festival, doesn’t take advantage of this. You have tech startups running around in the 70s carpeted corporate Austin Convention Center, rushing to meet the latest blogger, and only stopping in to a bar after the program is over. Why not instead integrate — even make core — the awesomeness of Austin into what innovative startups have to offer?

And I’ll be real: I’m insanely jealous of all the peeps there THIS week. At the music festival, in venues, supporting artists creating music.

Certainly innovators can tap into this.

Keep SxSW Weird!